Millar v. Maguire & Anor [2005] ScotSC 73 (10 August 2005)
The pursuer was in breach of contract by failing to pay the purchase price on the date of entry. The defenders were entitled to rescind the contract after giving prior written notice, which they did. The defenders were not in breach regarding the plan, and the pursuer cannot seek specific implement while in breach.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotSC 73
- Parties
- Pursuer: Joseph Millar; Defenders: David Maguire and Another
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; defenders assoilzied from the first crave of the Initial Writ.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Rescission of Contract, Conveyancing, Mutuality of Contract, Specific Implement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Millar
Pursuer
David Maguire and Another
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer was in breach of contract for failing to pay the purchase price on the date of entry
- 2 Whether the defenders were in breach for failing to deliver an acceptable plan
- 3 Whether the defenders validly rescinded the contract under the missives
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer was in breach of contract by failing to pay the purchase price on the date of entry. The defenders were entitled to rescind the contract after giving prior written notice, which they did. The defenders were not in breach regarding the plan, and the pursuer cannot seek specific implement while in breach.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; defenders assoilzied from the first crave of the Initial Writ.
Orders
- Hearing on expenses to be assigned; further orders reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment