Pelosi & Anor v O'Donnell & Ors [2014] ScotCS CSOH_46 (13 March 2014)

Pelosi & Anor v O'Donnell & Ors [2014] ScotCS CSOH_46 (13 March 2014)

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the payments of £11,000 to the second pursuer were made in settlement of his claim regarding dividends, and that he agreed to abandon the claim. The defenders' account was preferred based on documentary evidence, witness credibility, and the surrounding circumstances.

Citation
[2014] ScotCS CSOH_46
Parties
Pursuer: Dominic John Pelosi; Pursuer: Robert John O'Donnell; Defender: James Leo Richard O'Donnell; Defender: Other Defenders (children, executors, trustees of Karoline O'Donnell)
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
13 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Proof
Outcome
decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defenders against the second pursuer
Legal Topics
Breach of Trust, Compromise of Claims, Distribution of Dividends, Settlement Agreements
Trusts Family Law Company Law Breach of Trust Compromise of Claims Distribution of Dividends Settlement Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dominic John Pelosi

Pursuer

Robert John O'Donnell

Pursuer

James Leo Richard O'Donnell

Defender

Other Defenders (children, executors, trustees of Karoline O'Donnell)

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Preliminary Proof

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the second pursuer (Robert John O'Donnell) is barred from pursuing his claim against the trustees due to an alleged settlement agreement.
  2. 2 Whether payments of £11,000 to the second pursuer constituted a gift or a settlement of the legal claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the payments of £11,000 to the second pursuer were made in settlement of his claim regarding dividends, and that he agreed to abandon the claim. The defenders' account was preferred based on documentary evidence, witness credibility, and the surrounding circumstances.

Court Disposition

decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defenders against the second pursuer

Orders

  • Defenders' sixth plea-in-law upheld
  • Second pursuer's claim dismissed