R. & J. Dick v. East Coast Railways [1901] ScotLR 39_134 (22 November 1901)
Where goods are so seriously damaged in transit by a carrier that repair would not restore them to their original condition or utility, the consignee is entitled to reject the goods and recover the value of the goods as new, rather than being limited to the cost of repair.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 39_134
- Parties
- Pursuer: R. & J. Dick; Defender: East Coast Railways
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court at Glasgow to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; judgment for pursuers affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Carriage of Goods, Carrier Liability, Measure of Damages, Rejection of Goods, Damages for Injury to Goods in Transit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R. & J. Dick
Pursuer
East Coast Railways
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court at Glasgow to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuers were entitled to reject the machine due to damage in transit
- 2 Whether the measure of damages should be the cost of repair or the value of the machine as new
Ratio Decidendi
Where goods are so seriously damaged in transit by a carrier that repair would not restore them to their original condition or utility, the consignee is entitled to reject the goods and recover the value of the goods as new, rather than being limited to the cost of repair.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; judgment for pursuers affirmed
Orders
- Defenders to pay pursuers £100 sterling, with interest at 5% per annum from date of citation until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment