SCOTT ALEXANDER McDOUGALL v. ALAN KEMP TAWSE [2001] ScotSC 17 (14th September, 2001)
There is no absolute requirement that counsel must appear before the court can sanction their employment; the complexity of the legal issues in this case justifies the employment of junior counsel.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotSC 17
- Parties
- Pursuer: Scott Alexander McDougall; First Defender: Alan Kemp Tawse; Second Defender: Ian George Campbell Cruickshank; Second Defender: Ishbel Constance Garden; Second Defender: Alastair Robertson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Motion to Certify Proof as Suitable for Employment of Junior Counsel
- Outcome
- motion granted
- Legal Topics
- Certification of Counsel, Occupiers' Liability, Complexity of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scott Alexander McDougall
Pursuer
Alan Kemp Tawse
First Defender
Ian George Campbell Cruickshank
Second Defender
Ishbel Constance Garden
Second Defender
Alastair Robertson
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Motion to Certify Proof as Suitable for Employment of Junior Counsel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can sanction the employment of junior counsel where counsel has not appeared at proof
- 2 Whether the case merits the employment of junior counsel based on complexity
Ratio Decidendi
There is no absolute requirement that counsel must appear before the court can sanction their employment; the complexity of the legal issues in this case justifies the employment of junior counsel.
Court Disposition
motion granted
Orders
- Proof certified as suitable for the employment of junior counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment