Strong v. John Wright & Co. [1922] ScotLR 414 (01 June 1922)
The act of stepping down from the slowly moving lorry to recover the jacket was reasonably incidental to the appellant's employment and did not constitute an unreasonable risk or an act outside the scope of employment. The accident therefore arose out of and in the course of employment.
- Citation
- [1922] ScotLR 414
- Parties
- Appellant: Charles Strong; Respondent: John Wright & Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 1922
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration (workmen's Compensation) / Inner House, Court of Session (first Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; question of law answered in the negative.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Arising Out of and in the Course of Employment, Scope of Employment, Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Strong
Appellant
John Wright & Company
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration (workmen's Compensation) / Inner House, Court of Session (first Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accident arose out of and in the course of the appellant's employment under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
Ratio Decidendi
The act of stepping down from the slowly moving lorry to recover the jacket was reasonably incidental to the appellant's employment and did not constitute an unreasonable risk or an act outside the scope of employment. The accident therefore arose out of and in the course of employment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; question of law answered in the negative.
Orders
- The accident was held to arise out of the appellant's employment.
- Entitlement to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 established.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment