"Arden" Steamship Co., Ltd v. William Mathwin & Son [1911] ScotLR 143 (30 November 1911)
The delay was not covered by the exceptions in the charter-party because the failure of the collieries to produce the required coal was not a 'stoppage' in the ordinary sense, nor was it an accident or cause preventing or delaying loading. The obligation to provide a cargo is absolute unless clearly qualified, and the exceptions did not apply to the circumstances of this case.
- Citation
- [1911] ScotLR 143
- Parties
- Pursuer: “Arden” Steamship Company, Limited; Defender: William Mathwin & Son
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; defenders found liable for demurrage and payment ordered
- Legal Topics
- Charter Party, Demurrage, Contract Interpretation, Exceptions Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
“Arden” Steamship Company, Limited
Pursuer
William Mathwin & Son
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the delay in loading the vessel was covered by the exceptions in the charter-party, specifically 'stoppages at collieries' or 'any accident or cause beyond control of the charterers which may prevent or delay the loading'.
- 2 Whether the obligation to provide a cargo is absolute or qualified by the exceptions in the charter-party.
Ratio Decidendi
The delay was not covered by the exceptions in the charter-party because the failure of the collieries to produce the required coal was not a 'stoppage' in the ordinary sense, nor was it an accident or cause preventing or delaying loading. The obligation to provide a cargo is absolute unless clearly qualified, and the exceptions did not apply to the circumstances of this case.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; defenders found liable for demurrage and payment ordered
Orders
- Recall the interlocutor of the Sheriff-Substitute dated 29th November 1910.
- Find in fact that the delay in loading arose from causes for which the charterers are not excused under the charter-party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment