Aktieselskabet "Lina" v. George V. Turnbull & Co. [1907] ScotLR 44_367 (02 February 1907)
A vessel entering harbour to fulfil a contractual obligation to deliver to charterers is not entering 'only for convenience' and is not entitled to half dock rates. Under a time charter, unless the charter-party expressly provides otherwise, hire is payable during periods of quarantine detention, as such suspension is not to be implied.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 44_367
- Parties
- Pursuer: Aktieselskabet 'Lina' of Christiania, Norway, and Oluf Martin Mohn; Defender: George V. Turnbull & Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session, on Appeal From Sheriff Court at Edinburgh
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; interlocutor of Sheriff recalled; judgment of Sheriff-Substitute restored.
- Legal Topics
- Charter Party Interpretation, Harbour and Dock Rates, Quarantine and Hire Liability, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aktieselskabet 'Lina' of Christiania, Norway, and Oluf Martin Mohn
Pursuer
George V. Turnbull & Company
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session, on Appeal From Sheriff Court at Edinburgh
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a vessel entering Leith harbour for delivery to charterers under a time charter is entitled to half or full dock rates under the Leith Harbour and Docks Act 1892.
- 2 Whether charterers are liable to pay hire during a period when the vessel is detained in quarantine, under the terms of the charter-party.
Ratio Decidendi
A vessel entering harbour to fulfil a contractual obligation to deliver to charterers is not entering 'only for convenience' and is not entitled to half dock rates. Under a time charter, unless the charter-party expressly provides otherwise, hire is payable during periods of quarantine detention, as such suspension is not to be implied.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; interlocutor of Sheriff recalled; judgment of Sheriff-Substitute restored.
Orders
- Defenders to pay pursuers £23, 15s. 8d. with interest at 5%
- Pursuers entitled to expenses in inferior court since 30 November 1905 and two-thirds of expenses in superior court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment