CHENAO LI v PROCURATOR FISCAL, STIRLING [2016] ScotSAC Crim 7 (8 April 2016)

The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the statutory criteria for refusal were met based on the facts presented.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2016] ScotSAC Crim 7
Parties: Appellant: Chenao Li; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Stirling
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judgment Date: 08 April 2016
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Bail, Appeal Procedure

Criminal Law Bail Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Chenao Li

Appellant

Procurator Fiscal, Stirling

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing bail to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the statutory criteria for refusal were met based on the facts presented.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

bail refused
appellant to remain in custody

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.