McKerrow v. C (a child) [2005] ScotCS CSIH_91 (22 December 2005)
The court determined that the previous decisions should be recalled and the matter remitted to the Sheriff Court for a fresh determination, as the issue of contact must be decided based on current circumstances and the sheriff's reasoning was open to valid criticism regarding the best interests of the child.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSIH_91
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Brian Junior McKerrow; Defender and Respondent: C (a child)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Opinion of the Court on Appeal From Sheriff Principal
- Outcome
- previous interlocutors recalled; matter remitted for fresh determination
- Legal Topics
- Child Contact, Best Interests of the Child, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Junior McKerrow
Pursuer and Appellant
C (a child)
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Opinion of the Court on Appeal From Sheriff Principal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff appropriately determined the best interests of the child
- 2 Whether the sheriff's reasoning was legally sound
- 3 Whether the appeal should be refused or the matter remitted for fresh determination
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the previous decisions should be recalled and the matter remitted to the Sheriff Court for a fresh determination, as the issue of contact must be decided based on current circumstances and the sheriff's reasoning was open to valid criticism regarding the best interests of the child.
Court Disposition
previous interlocutors recalled; matter remitted for fresh determination
Orders
- Recall the interlocutors of the sheriff principal and the sheriff.
- Remit the matter to the Sheriff Court at Glasgow for a new sheriff to determine afresh.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment