SP v LS [2001] ScotCS 141 (1 June 2001)
The Sheriff's findings regarding repeated incidents of sexual excitement in the child's presence, interpreted as intentional and posing unacceptable risk of sexual harm, justified refusal of access. The Sheriff applied the correct legal test and exercised discretion reasonably; refusal of access was appropriate given the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 141
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: S. P; Defender and Appellant: L. S
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal to Court of Session
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Custody, Child Access, Welfare of the Child, Sexual Risk Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. P
Pursuer and Respondent
L. S
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal to Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sheriff erred in refusing access to the defender based on risk to the child's welfare
- 2 Whether the Sheriff's findings-in-fact justified refusal of access
- 3 Appropriateness of permanent refusal of access
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff's findings regarding repeated incidents of sexual excitement in the child's presence, interpreted as intentional and posing unacceptable risk of sexual harm, justified refusal of access. The Sheriff applied the correct legal test and exercised discretion reasonably; refusal of access was appropriate given the circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Orders
- affirmation of interlocutors of Sheriff and Sheriff Principal
- remit cause back to Sheriff Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment