APPEALS BY YL, WBL AND RL IN THE CAUSE EAST LOTHIAN COUNCIL v YL AND WBL, AND ML AND RL [2023] ScotSAC Civ 1 (21 December 2022)
The Sheriff Appeal Court held that the sheriff had correctly applied the statutory test, properly considered the welfare of the children, and that the procedural requirements were met. The appeals were refused.
- Citation
- [2023] ScotSAC Civ 1
- Parties
- Pursuer: East Lothian Council; Defender/appellant: YL; Defender/appellant: WBL; Defender/appellant: RL; Defender: ML
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeals refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Welfare, Parental Rights, Removal of Children, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
East Lothian Council
Pursuer
YL
Defender/appellant
WBL
Defender/appellant
RL
Defender/appellant
ML
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in law in granting a permanence order with authority to adopt
- 2 Whether the welfare of the children required the making of the order
- 3 Whether the procedural requirements were met
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff Appeal Court held that the sheriff had correctly applied the statutory test, properly considered the welfare of the children, and that the procedural requirements were met. The appeals were refused.
Court Disposition
appeals refused
Orders
- The appeals by YL, WBL, and RL are refused.
- The permanence order with authority to adopt is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment