Naftalin v LMS Railway [1933] ScotCS CSIH_1 (18 January 1933)
The right to claim solatium for wrongful death is a substantive right governed by the law of the place where the delict occurred (England). Since English law does not recognise a claim for solatium in such cases, the pursuer's claim for solatium cannot be sustained in Scotland, even though Scottish law would otherwise allow it.
- Citation
- [1933] ScotCS CSIH_1
- Parties
- Pursuer: Naftalin; Defender: London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 1933
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury/delict (wrongful Death) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Before the Second Division of the Court of Session
- Outcome
- Pursuer's claim for solatium disallowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled to that extent; defenders' plea sustained as to solatium; action to proceed only on pecuniary loss.
- Legal Topics
- Choice of Law in Tort, Damages for Wrongful Death, Solatium, Measure of Damages, Lex Loci Delicti, Lex Fori
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naftalin
Pursuer
London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/delict (wrongful Death) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Before the Second Division of the Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the right to claim solatium (damages for wounded feelings) for wrongful death is governed by the law of the forum (Scotland) or the law of the place of the delict (England)
- 2 Whether the elements of damages (including solatium) are matters of substantive right or remedy/procedure in cross-border tort cases
Ratio Decidendi
The right to claim solatium for wrongful death is a substantive right governed by the law of the place where the delict occurred (England). Since English law does not recognise a claim for solatium in such cases, the pursuer's claim for solatium cannot be sustained in Scotland, even though Scottish law would otherwise allow it.
Court Disposition
Pursuer's claim for solatium disallowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled to that extent; defenders' plea sustained as to solatium; action to proceed only on pecuniary loss.
Orders
- Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor in so far as it allowed claim for solatium.
- Sustain defenders' plea to relevancy regarding solatium.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment