CJR v. IN RESPECT OF THE ADULT JMR [2013] ScotSC 25 (27 February 2013)
Guardianship is the least restrictive and most beneficial option for safeguarding JMR's welfare and financial interests, given his lifelong incapacity, inability to consent, and the inadequacy of alternative statutory measures.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotSC 25
- Parties
- Applicant: CJR; Adult: JMR
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Application for Guardianship Order Under Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Guardianship order granted.
- Legal Topics
- Guardianship, Adults With Incapacity, Least Restrictive Option, Deprivation of Liberty, Welfare and Financial Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CJR
Applicant
JMR
Adult
Procedural Posture
Summary Application for Guardianship Order Under Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether guardianship is the least restrictive option for safeguarding and promoting the adult's interests
- 2 Whether the applicant is a suitable person to be appointed guardian
- 3 Whether alternative statutory measures are sufficient
Ratio Decidendi
Guardianship is the least restrictive and most beneficial option for safeguarding JMR's welfare and financial interests, given his lifelong incapacity, inability to consent, and the inadequacy of alternative statutory measures.
Court Disposition
Guardianship order granted.
Orders
- Appoints CJR as financial and welfare guardian to JMR for 10 years with specified powers over property, financial affairs, and personal welfare.
- Dispenses with need for caution and management plan.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment