CM, APPEAL BY CM v ME-M [2019] ScotSAC CIV 030 (24 July 2019)
The sheriff did not err in law or in the exercise of discretion; the welfare of the child was properly considered and the refusal of contact was justified on the evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] ScotSAC CIV 030
- Parties
- Appellant: CM; Respondent: ME-M
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contact Orders, Child Welfare, Appeal Procedure
Family Law Contact Orders Child Welfare Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
CM
Appellant
ME-M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing contact between the appellant and the child
- 2 Whether the welfare of the child was properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff did not err in law or in the exercise of discretion; the welfare of the child was properly considered and the refusal of contact was justified on the evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order for contact between appellant and child
- No expenses awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment