M'leans v. Johnstone And Others [1906] ScotLR 43_612 (25 May 1906)

M'leans v. Johnstone And Others [1906] ScotLR 43_612 (25 May 1906)

Collision cases involving interpretation of regulations and requiring nautical expertise are unsuitable for jury trial; presence of a nautical assessor precludes jury trial. The case should be tried by proof before a judge assisted by a nautical assessor.

Citation
[1906] ScotLR 43_612
Parties
Pursuers/appellants: John and Helen M'Lean; Defenders/respondents: Peter Johnstone and Others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
25 May 1906
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages for Collision at Sea / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session for Jury Trial
Outcome
Jury trial disallowed; case remitted for proof before Lord Salvesen.
Legal Topics
Collision at Sea, Damages, Jury Trial, Interpretation of Regulations, Nautical Assessor

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John and Helen M'Lean

Pursuers/appellants

Peter Johnstone and Others

Defenders/respondents

Procedural Posture

Action of Damages for Collision at Sea / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session for Jury Trial

  1. 1 Whether the action of damages for collision at sea is suitable for jury trial under Court of Session Act 1868 and Judicature Act 1825
  2. 2 Whether the presence of a nautical assessor precludes jury trial
  3. 3 Interpretation and application of regulations for preventing collisions at sea

Ratio Decidendi

Collision cases involving interpretation of regulations and requiring nautical expertise are unsuitable for jury trial; presence of a nautical assessor precludes jury trial. The case should be tried by proof before a judge assisted by a nautical assessor.

Court Disposition

Jury trial disallowed; case remitted for proof before Lord Salvesen.

Orders

  • Appoint the cause to be tried by proof before Lord Salvesen.
  • Remit to him to proceed in the cause, reserving all questions of expenses.