M'leans v. Johnstone And Others [1906] ScotLR 43_612 (25 May 1906)
Collision cases involving interpretation of regulations and requiring nautical expertise are unsuitable for jury trial; presence of a nautical assessor precludes jury trial. The case should be tried by proof before a judge assisted by a nautical assessor.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 43_612
- Parties
- Pursuers/appellants: John and Helen M'Lean; Defenders/respondents: Peter Johnstone and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages for Collision at Sea / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session for Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Jury trial disallowed; case remitted for proof before Lord Salvesen.
- Legal Topics
- Collision at Sea, Damages, Jury Trial, Interpretation of Regulations, Nautical Assessor
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John and Helen M'Lean
Pursuers/appellants
Peter Johnstone and Others
Defenders/respondents
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages for Collision at Sea / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session for Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the action of damages for collision at sea is suitable for jury trial under Court of Session Act 1868 and Judicature Act 1825
- 2 Whether the presence of a nautical assessor precludes jury trial
- 3 Interpretation and application of regulations for preventing collisions at sea
Ratio Decidendi
Collision cases involving interpretation of regulations and requiring nautical expertise are unsuitable for jury trial; presence of a nautical assessor precludes jury trial. The case should be tried by proof before a judge assisted by a nautical assessor.
Court Disposition
Jury trial disallowed; case remitted for proof before Lord Salvesen.
Orders
- Appoint the cause to be tried by proof before Lord Salvesen.
- Remit to him to proceed in the cause, reserving all questions of expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment