Trustees of the Clyde Navigation v. Wilhelmsen [1915] ScotLR 304 (27 January 1915)
The Firth of Clyde at the site of the collision is a narrow channel within the meaning of Article 25 of the Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1897, and the defender was in breach of the duty to keep to starboard, rendering him liable for damages.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 304
- Parties
- Pursuers and Appellants: Trustees of the Clyde Navigation; Defender and Respondent: W. Wilhelmsen, owner of the steamship 'Waterloo' of Tonsberg, Norway
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (damages for Collision) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; defender found liable for damages.
- Legal Topics
- Collision at Sea, Narrow Channel Rule, Interpretation of Regulations, Liability for Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trustees of the Clyde Navigation
Pursuers and Appellants
W. Wilhelmsen, owner of the steamship 'Waterloo' of Tonsberg, Norway
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (damages for Collision) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Firth of Clyde at the locus of collision is a 'narrow channel' under Article 25 of the Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1897
- 2 Whether the defender was liable for damages resulting from the collision
Ratio Decidendi
The Firth of Clyde at the site of the collision is a narrow channel within the meaning of Article 25 of the Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1897, and the defender was in breach of the duty to keep to starboard, rendering him liable for damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; defender found liable for damages.
Orders
- Interlocutor of the Sheriff-Substitute recalled.
- Found in fact that the collision took place in a narrow channel within Article 25.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment