Horn & Co., Ltd v. Tangyes, Ltd [1906] ScotLR 43_362 (06 February 1906)
The interlocutor, though not expressly termed 'sisting process', in substance stays proceedings until caution is found and thus qualifies as a sisting process, making the appeal competent under section 24 of the Sheriff Court Act 1853.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 43_362
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: John Horn & Company, Limited; Defender/respondent: Tangyes, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Appeal on Competency
- Outcome
- Appeal held competent; court proceeds to hear the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Appeal, Security for Costs, Sisting Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Horn & Company, Limited
Pursuer/appellant
Tangyes, Limited
Defender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Appeal on Competency
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the interlocutor ordaining the pursuers to find caution and sisting procedure appealable under section 24 of the Sheriff Court Act 1853?
- 2 Does the interlocutor constitute a sisting process within the meaning of the statute?
Ratio Decidendi
The interlocutor, though not expressly termed 'sisting process', in substance stays proceedings until caution is found and thus qualifies as a sisting process, making the appeal competent under section 24 of the Sheriff Court Act 1853.
Court Disposition
Appeal held competent; court proceeds to hear the appeal.
Orders
- Appeal allowed to proceed; court to hear merits.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment