A. E. Abrahams Ltd and Another v. Campbell [1910] ScotLR 191 (30 November 1910)
The action was not a 'summary cause' because the real question at issue was the interpretation of a contract involving a continuing liability exceeding £50; therefore, the appeal was competent under section 28 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 191
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: A. E. Abrahams Limited and A. E. Abrahams (individual); Defender/respondent: William Campbell junior
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session (inner House, First Division)
- Outcome
- Objection to competency of appeal repelled; appeal held competent.
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Appeal, Summary Cause Definition, Contract Interpretation, Sheriff Courts (scotland) Act 1907
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. E. Abrahams Limited and A. E. Abrahams (individual)
Pursuer/appellant
William Campbell junior
Defender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session (inner House, First Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the action was a 'summary cause' under the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907, thus limiting appeal rights
- 2 Whether the value and nature of the contract made the appeal competent despite the sum sued for being under £50
Ratio Decidendi
The action was not a 'summary cause' because the real question at issue was the interpretation of a contract involving a continuing liability exceeding £50; therefore, the appeal was competent under section 28 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907.
Court Disposition
Objection to competency of appeal repelled; appeal held competent.
Orders
- Objection to competency of appeal repelled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment