Whitton v. Ewing, Edgar, & Aitken [1911] ScotLR 672 (17 March 1911)
An appeal is competent against an interlocutor of a Sheriff-Substitute fixing questions to be put to a jury in a Sheriff Court action, where leave to appeal is granted under section 28(c) of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907. Sections 31-33 do not exclude such an appeal, and section 14 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 does not preclude it in this context. The interlocutor is judicial, not merely ministerial, and the appeal is not excluded by the requirement for a stated case.
- Citation
- [1911] ScotLR 672
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Whitton; Defenders: Ewing, Edgar, & Aitken
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal on Competency of Appeal Against Interlocutor Fixing Jury Questions
- Outcome
- Appeal held competent; cause appointed to be put to the Summar Roll.
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Appeal, Jury Trial Procedure, Sheriff Courts (scotland) Act 1907, Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, Employers' Liability Act 1880
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Whitton
Pursuer
Ewing, Edgar, & Aitken
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal on Competency of Appeal Against Interlocutor Fixing Jury Questions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal is competent against an interlocutor of a Sheriff-Substitute fixing questions to be put to a jury in a Sheriff Court action under the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907, particularly in light of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
Ratio Decidendi
An appeal is competent against an interlocutor of a Sheriff-Substitute fixing questions to be put to a jury in a Sheriff Court action, where leave to appeal is granted under section 28(c) of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907. Sections 31-33 do not exclude such an appeal, and section 14 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 does not preclude it in this context. The interlocutor is judicial, not merely ministerial, and the appeal is not excluded by the requirement for a stated case.
Court Disposition
Appeal held competent; cause appointed to be put to the Summar Roll.
Orders
- Competency of the appeal sustained.
- Cause to be put to the Summar Roll for further procedure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment