Purves v. Carswell [1905] ScotLR 43_266 (21 December 1905)
There is no incompetency in a Lord Ordinary, though removed to the Inner House, completing the trial of an action tried without a jury under the Lunacy Acts, as the statute intends the same judge who heard the evidence to pronounce findings and dispose of the cause.
- Citation
- [1905] ScotLR 43_266
- Parties
- Pursuer: William Purves; Defender: Dr John Carswell
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1905
- Procedural Posture
- Action for Damages / Interlocutory Ruling on Competency of Judge to Complete Trial
- Outcome
- case remitted to Lord Pearson to proceed and pronounce findings as if still Lord Ordinary
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Judge, Trial Procedure Without Jury, Lunacy Acts, Damages for Wrongful Certification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Purves
Pursuer
Dr John Carswell
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action for Damages / Interlocutory Ruling on Competency of Judge to Complete Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Lord Ordinary, removed to the Inner House before pronouncing findings in fact, is competent to complete the trial of an action tried without a jury under the Lunacy Acts
Ratio Decidendi
There is no incompetency in a Lord Ordinary, though removed to the Inner House, completing the trial of an action tried without a jury under the Lunacy Acts, as the statute intends the same judge who heard the evidence to pronounce findings and dispose of the cause.
Court Disposition
case remitted to Lord Pearson to proceed and pronounce findings as if still Lord Ordinary
Orders
- Remit case to Lord Pearson to pronounce interlocutor containing findings in fact and proceed as if still Lord Ordinary before whom the cause depended
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment