Corporation of Trinity House, Leith v. Clark and Others [1910] ScotLR 673 (14 May 1910)
The Court held that the reclaimer should not be barred from having his reclaiming note received due to the absence of a printed record, which resulted from a prior dispensation granted by the Court. The application to dispense with printing was granted as the reclaimer was not at fault and could not comply with the regulation.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 673
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Corporation of Trinity House, Leith; Defender/reclaimer: Janet L. Clark and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Reclaiming Note (appeal) in Inner House
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Reclaiming Note, Dispensation of Printing Requirements, Judicature Act 1825
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corporation of Trinity House, Leith
Pursuer/respondent
Janet L. Clark and Others
Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil / Reclaiming Note (appeal) in Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reclaiming note is competent when printing of the record was dispensed with in the Outer House
- 2 Whether the reclaimer can be denied a hearing for non-compliance with procedural regulations beyond his control
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the reclaimer should not be barred from having his reclaiming note received due to the absence of a printed record, which resulted from a prior dispensation granted by the Court. The application to dispense with printing was granted as the reclaimer was not at fault and could not comply with the regulation.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Court dispensed with the printing of the reclaiming note and allowed the manuscript reclaiming note to be received.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment