Lamb v. Thompson [1901] ScotLR 39_80 (07 November 1901)
Suspension is a competent remedy to review a Sheriff Court decree ad factum præstandum, particularly where the charge threatens imprisonment and the complainer is unable to comply due to circumstances such as the goods having been sold and the complainer lacking knowledge of the purchasers' identities.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 39_80
- Parties
- Complainer/respondent: D. B. Lamb; Respondent/reclaimer: M. Thompson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Suspension of Charge Under Sheriff Court Decree / Reclaiming Note (appeal) in Inner House, Second Division
- Outcome
- reclaiming note refused; suspension granted by consent
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Suspension, Review of Inferior Court Decrees, Imprisonment for Non Delivery, Sheriff Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. B. Lamb
Complainer/respondent
M. Thompson
Respondent/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Suspension of Charge Under Sheriff Court Decree / Reclaiming Note (appeal) in Inner House, Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Is suspension a competent remedy to review a Sheriff Court decree ad factum præstandum where imprisonment is threatened?
- 2 Can a party seek suspension after failing to appeal the original decree?
Ratio Decidendi
Suspension is a competent remedy to review a Sheriff Court decree ad factum præstandum, particularly where the charge threatens imprisonment and the complainer is unable to comply due to circumstances such as the goods having been sold and the complainer lacking knowledge of the purchasers' identities.
Court Disposition
reclaiming note refused; suspension granted by consent
Orders
- Suspension of the proceedings complained of, and whole warrants and grounds thereof, granted by consent.
- Complainer (Lamb) entitled to expenses of the suspension.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment