Morris v Highland Spring Ltd [1998] ScotCS 69 (18 November 1998)
The pursuer must provide further specification in his pleadings regarding the work done and expenses claimed to give fair notice to the defenders. The contractual fee ceiling does not apply to additional services instructed under clause 6; the pursuer is entitled to claim fees for such additional services over and above the stated ceilings.
- Citation
- [1998] ScotCS 69
- Parties
- Pursuer: Gordon Morris carrying on practice as Morris Engineering Design Services; Defender: Highland Spring Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedure Roll (pleadings Challenge)
- Outcome
- Case put out By Order for further specification by the pursuer.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contract, Payment for Services, Specification of Pleadings, Contractual Ceilings, Additional Services Under Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon Morris carrying on practice as Morris Engineering Design Services
Pursuer
Highland Spring Ltd
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedure Roll (pleadings Challenge)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's pleadings provide sufficient specification to entitle him to proof before answer for contractual and extra-contractual claims
- 2 Whether the contract imposes a ceiling on fees for additional services instructed under clause 6
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer must provide further specification in his pleadings regarding the work done and expenses claimed to give fair notice to the defenders. The contractual fee ceiling does not apply to additional services instructed under clause 6; the pursuer is entitled to claim fees for such additional services over and above the stated ceilings.
Court Disposition
Case put out By Order for further specification by the pursuer.
Orders
- Pursuer to provide further specification of work done and expenses claimed in pleadings.
- Case to proceed to proof before answer subject to further specification.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment