Denholm's Trustees v. Denholm [1907] ScotLR 32 (29 October 1907)
The term 'carriages' in the will is sufficiently elastic to include motor cars, and the testator's intention was for his widow to have the means of locomotion he possessed at death. The bequest was not adeemed, and motor cars fall within the bequest.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 32
- Parties
- First Party: Denholm's Trustees; Second Party: Mrs Denholm (Kate Gillies or Denholm); Third Party: Residuary Legatees (Thomas, Janet, children of Elizabeth)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- first question answered in the affirmative, second in the negative; motor cars included in bequest to widow
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Interpretation of Bequests, Ademption, Definition of 'carriages'
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denholm's Trustees
First Party
Mrs Denholm (Kate Gillies or Denholm)
Second Party
Residuary Legatees (Thomas, Janet, children of Elizabeth)
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the bequest of 'horses and carriages' include motor cars?
- 2 Is the bequest adeemed by change in the nature of the property?
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'carriages' in the will is sufficiently elastic to include motor cars, and the testator's intention was for his widow to have the means of locomotion he possessed at death. The bequest was not adeemed, and motor cars fall within the bequest.
Court Disposition
first question answered in the affirmative, second in the negative; motor cars included in bequest to widow
Orders
- Motor cars to be delivered to Mrs Denholm under the fourth purpose of the trust-disposition and settlement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment