THE FRASERBURGH HARBOUR COMMISSIONERS AGAINST McLAUGHLIN & HARVEY LTD [2021] ScotCS CSOH_8 (26 January 2021)
Clause W2.4 of the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract operates as a contractual bar, requiring that any dispute must first be referred to adjudication before it can be brought before a tribunal (arbitration or court). The pursuer is contractually barred from bringing the action before the court without prior adjudication, and the action must be dismissed as there is no ancillary purpose for the court to entertain the suit.
- Citation
- [2021] ScotCS CSOH_8
- Parties
- Pursuer: The Fraserburgh Harbour Commissioners; Defender: McLaughlin & Harvey Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Debate on Preliminary Plea
- Outcome
- action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contractual Dispute Resolution, Adjudication, Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Contractual Bar
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Fraserburgh Harbour Commissioners
Pursuer
McLaughlin & Harvey Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Debate on Preliminary Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 Does clause W2.4 of the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract operate as a contractual bar to court or arbitration proceedings unless the dispute is first referred to adjudication?
- 2 Does the clause wholly oust the jurisdiction of the Scottish courts?
- 3 Is the pursuer entitled to bring an action before the court without prior adjudication?
Ratio Decidendi
Clause W2.4 of the NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract operates as a contractual bar, requiring that any dispute must first be referred to adjudication before it can be brought before a tribunal (arbitration or court). The pursuer is contractually barred from bringing the action before the court without prior adjudication, and the action must be dismissed as there is no ancillary purpose for the court to entertain the suit.
Court Disposition
action dismissed
Orders
- Defender's first plea of contractual bar sustained
- Action put out by order; motion for dismissal reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment