GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL AGAINST FIRST GLASGOW (NO 1) LTD [2019] ScotCS CSOH_101 (10 December 2019)
Section 3 of the 1940 Act does not apply unless both parties are liable to the injured person; a previous employer giving an employment reference does not owe a duty of care to third parties injured by the employee in subsequent employment, as there is no proximity or assumption of responsibility, and it would not be fair, just or reasonable to impose such a duty.
- Citation
- [2019] ScotCS CSOH_101
- Parties
- Pursuer: Glasgow City Council; Defender: First Glasgow (No 1) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action for Contribution Under Statute / Debate on Relevancy, Interlocutor on Dismissal
- Outcome
- action dismissed (no substantive order at present due to pending amendment)
- Legal Topics
- Contribution Among Joint Wrongdoers, Duty of Care, Negligent Misstatement, Employment References
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glasgow City Council
Pursuer
First Glasgow (No 1) Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action for Contribution Under Statute / Debate on Relevancy, Interlocutor on Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a previous employer liable to contribute under section 3 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1940 for damages paid by a subsequent employer to third parties injured by an employee, based on alleged negligent omission in an employment reference?
- 2 Does a previous employer owe a duty of care to third parties injured by the employee in the course of new employment, arising from the content of an employment reference?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 3 of the 1940 Act does not apply unless both parties are liable to the injured person; a previous employer giving an employment reference does not owe a duty of care to third parties injured by the employee in subsequent employment, as there is no proximity or assumption of responsibility, and it would not be fair, just or reasonable to impose such a duty.
Court Disposition
action dismissed (no substantive order at present due to pending amendment)
Orders
- case put out by order for discussion as to how to proceed in light of opinion and continued motion
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment