The Performing Right Society, Ltd v. Magistrates of Edinburgh [1922] ScotLR 194 (07 January 1922)
The Society is not a trade union within the meaning of the Trade Union Acts because its principal object is not to impose restrictive conditions on the conduct of trade but to enable members to jointly protect and exploit their copyright performing rights. The restrictions are ancillary and not the principal object. Therefore, its registration under the Companies Acts is valid and it has title to sue.
- Citation
- [1922] ScotLR 194
- Parties
- Pursuer: The Performing Right Society, Limited; Defender: Magistrates of Edinburgh (Provost, Magistrates, and Councillors of the City of Edinburgh)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 January 1922
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Defenders' plea to title to sue repelled; interlocutor varied in form; proof allowed on averments, with certain averments excluded.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright, Restraint of Trade, Title to Sue, Trade Union Definition, Company Incorporation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Performing Right Society, Limited
Pursuer
Magistrates of Edinburgh (Provost, Magistrates, and Councillors of the City of Edinburgh)
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Performing Right Society, Limited is a trade union within the meaning of the Trade Union Acts and thus incapable of registration under the Companies Acts and without title to sue.
- 2 Whether the Society's objects are in restraint of trade.
Ratio Decidendi
The Society is not a trade union within the meaning of the Trade Union Acts because its principal object is not to impose restrictive conditions on the conduct of trade but to enable members to jointly protect and exploit their copyright performing rights. The restrictions are ancillary and not the principal object. Therefore, its registration under the Companies Acts is valid and it has title to sue.
Court Disposition
Defenders' plea to title to sue repelled; interlocutor varied in form; proof allowed on averments, with certain averments excluded.
Orders
- Repel defenders' pleas to pursuers' title to sue.
- Vary Lord Ordinary's interlocutor to exclude certain averments from proof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment