Cantwell v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board [2000] ScotCS 36 (9 February 2000)
Section 10 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 precludes deduction of the petitioner's ill-health pension in assessing damages for the period after normal retirement age; the Board's decision to deduct the pension was therefore unlawful and must be reduced.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 36
- Parties
- Petitioner and Reclaimer: Ian Cantwell; Respondent: Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion (appeal) in Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Judicial Review by Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Petitioner's reclaiming motion allowed; Board's decision reduced; matter remitted to Board for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme, Deduction of Pensions From Compensation, Interpretation of Statutory and Non Statutory Schemes, Section 10 Administration of Justice Act 1982, Common Law Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Cantwell
Petitioner and Reclaimer
Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) in Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Judicial Review by Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ill-health pension received by the petitioner should be deducted from compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme, particularly for the period after normal retirement age.
- 2 Whether section 10 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 precludes deduction of the ill-health pension in assessing damages.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 precludes deduction of the petitioner's ill-health pension in assessing damages for the period after normal retirement age; the Board's decision to deduct the pension was therefore unlawful and must be reduced.
Court Disposition
Petitioner's reclaiming motion allowed; Board's decision reduced; matter remitted to Board for reconsideration.
Orders
- Sustain the petitioner's plea in law.
- Repel the respondents' pleas.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment