DANIEL HAMAND v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, GLASGOW [2016] ScotSAC Crim 15 (4 May 2016)
The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the risk factors identified justified continued detention.
- Citation
- [2016] ScotSAC Crim 15
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Hamand; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Glasgow
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Daniel Hamand
Appellant
Procurator Fiscal, Glasgow
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal of bail was justified in the circumstances of the case
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the risk factors identified justified continued detention.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- bail refused
- appellant to remain in custody
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment