APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY DARRELL MITCHELL AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_60 (18 August 2017)
The sheriff erred by failing to give adequate directions to the jury regarding the use and evaluation of expert opinion evidence, but this omission did not result in a miscarriage of justice given the abundance of incriminating evidence and the clarity of the issues before the jury.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_60
- Parties
- Appellant: Darrell Mitchell; Respondent: Her Majesty’s Advocate
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Misdirection, Expert Evidence, Drug Supply, Opinion Evidence, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darrell Mitchell
Appellant
Her Majesty’s Advocate
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the sheriff fail to properly direct the jury on the use of opinion evidence, specifically expert testimony from a police officer?
- 2 Did this failure result in a miscarriage of justice?
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff erred by failing to give adequate directions to the jury regarding the use and evaluation of expert opinion evidence, but this omission did not result in a miscarriage of justice given the abundance of incriminating evidence and the clarity of the issues before the jury.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment