THE PANEL ON TAKEOVERS AND MERGERS AGAINST DAVID CUNNINGHAM KING [2017] ScotCS CSOH_156 (22 December 2017)
The court has discretion under section 955 of the Companies Act 2006 to refuse to grant an order, but in this case, the respondent's arguments of impecuniosity and futility are irrelevant or unsubstantiated; public interest and the integrity of the takeover regime require the order to be granted.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotCS CSOH_156
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Panel on Takeovers and Mergers; Respondent: David Cunningham King
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- order granted
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Takeover Offers, Court Discretion Under Companies Act 2006 S955, Acting in Concert, Enforcement of Panel Decisions, Shareholder Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Panel on Takeovers and Mergers
Petitioner
David Cunningham King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the court have discretion to refuse an order under section 955 of the Companies Act 2006?
- 2 Should the court exercise its discretion to refuse the order sought by the Panel given the respondent's alleged impecuniosity and the futility of the order?
Ratio Decidendi
The court has discretion under section 955 of the Companies Act 2006 to refuse to grant an order, but in this case, the respondent's arguments of impecuniosity and futility are irrelevant or unsubstantiated; public interest and the integrity of the takeover regime require the order to be granted.
Court Disposition
order granted
Orders
- Respondent is ordered to announce and make a mandatory offer at 20p per share for all Rangers International Football Club Plc shares not already controlled by him or his concert parties, in accordance with the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment