DAVID JOHN KIRKHAM AGAINST SNEDDON MORRISON, SOLICITORS, LIVINGSTON [2015] ScotSC 46 (23 June 2015)
An action for delivery of documents based on asserted ownership is ex facie competent as a summary cause in the Sheriff Court; the existence of alternative procedures does not render such an action incompetent.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: David John Kirkham; Respondent: Sneddon Morrison, Solicitors Livingston
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutor of 1 November 2013 recalled; cause remitted to sheriff at Livingston.
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Summary Cause, Delivery of Documents, Ownership of Solicitors' Files
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David John Kirkham
Appellant
Sneddon Morrison, Solicitors Livingston
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an action for delivery of documents can competently be brought by summary cause in the Sheriff Court
- 2 Whether existence of alternative procedures renders summary cause incompetent
Ratio Decidendi
An action for delivery of documents based on asserted ownership is ex facie competent as a summary cause in the Sheriff Court; the existence of alternative procedures does not render such an action incompetent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of 1 November 2013 recalled; cause remitted to sheriff at Livingston.
Orders
- Defenders liable to appellant in expenses of appeal and hearing of 1 November 2013.
- Account of expenses to be lodged and remitted to Auditor of Court to tax and report.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment