Lynch's Judicial Factor v. Lynch [1900] ScotLR 37_462 (21 February 1900)
The enhanced value of the ground-annuals, as part of the undivided trust estate, must be credited equally to the second and third parties, since no specific allocation was made and the estate was administered as a single fund.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_462
- Parties
- Applicant: David Simpson Carson (Judicial Factor); Second Parties/respondents: Mary Margaret Lynch (Mrs Griffin) and her children, with consent of her husband; Third Parties/respondents: Surviving daughter and widow of James Lynch junior
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Fourth and fifth questions answered affirmatively; enhanced value of ground-annuals to be credited equally to second and third parties; third parties entitled to expenses against second parties.
- Legal Topics
- Division and Distribution of Estate, Gain on Investments, Rights of Beneficiaries, Apportionment of Trust Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Simpson Carson (Judicial Factor)
Applicant
Mary Margaret Lynch (Mrs Griffin) and her children, with consent of her husband
Second Parties/respondents
Surviving daughter and widow of James Lynch junior
Third Parties/respondents
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 How should the increase in value of ground-annuals held as trust investments be apportioned between beneficiaries when no specific allocation was made?
- 2 Should profit from enhanced asset value be divided equally or in proportion to beneficiaries' interests at purchase date?
Ratio Decidendi
The enhanced value of the ground-annuals, as part of the undivided trust estate, must be credited equally to the second and third parties, since no specific allocation was made and the estate was administered as a single fund.
Court Disposition
Fourth and fifth questions answered affirmatively; enhanced value of ground-annuals to be credited equally to second and third parties; third parties entitled to expenses against second parties.
Orders
- Enhanced value of ground-annuals credited equally to second and third parties.
- Third parties entitled to expenses as against second parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment