Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow v. Colquhoun [1900] ScotLR 37_909 (14 July 1900)
The Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow had title to present the petition for removal from the roll of law-agents and notaries-public, and the averments disclosed a relevant case for inquiry into professional misconduct, notwithstanding the respondent's prior acquittal on criminal charges. Proof was allowed on the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_909
- Parties
- Petitioner: Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow; Respondent: David Turnbull Colquhoun
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Removal From Roll of Law Agents and Notaries Public for Professional Misconduct / Interlocutory; Proof Allowed on Averments
- Outcome
- Proof allowed; interlocutor pronounced permitting both parties to lead evidence on their averments.
- Legal Topics
- Law Agent Misconduct, Title to Sue, Res Judicata, Removal From Roll, Notary Public, Law Agents (scotland) Act 1873
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow
Petitioner
David Turnbull Colquhoun
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Removal From Roll of Law Agents and Notaries Public for Professional Misconduct / Interlocutory; Proof Allowed on Averments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow had title to present the petition for removal from the roll of law-agents and notaries-public
- 2 Whether the averments disclosed a relevant case for inquiry into professional misconduct despite prior criminal acquittal
- 3 Whether res judicata applied due to prior criminal proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow had title to present the petition for removal from the roll of law-agents and notaries-public, and the averments disclosed a relevant case for inquiry into professional misconduct, notwithstanding the respondent's prior acquittal on criminal charges. Proof was allowed on the parties' respective averments.
Court Disposition
Proof allowed; interlocutor pronounced permitting both parties to lead evidence on their averments.
Orders
- Allow both parties a proof of their respective averments on a day to be afterwards fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment