Neilson v. R. B. Wilson & Co. [1904] ScotLR 42_111 (17 November 1904)
The strip of ground in question, by virtue of the statutory provisions and the plans submitted for lining, has been dedicated to public street purposes and cannot be reclaimed by the proprietor. The proprietors are liable for the formation and repair of the footpath as required by the Master of Works, and the Dean of Guild was correct in granting the order for the works to be executed at their expense.
- Citation
- [1904] ScotLR 42_111
- Parties
- Petitioner/respondent: George Neilson, Procurator-Fiscal of the Glasgow Dean of Guild Court; Defender/appellant: R. B. Wilson & Company; Defender/appellant: John Howie (representing Thomas M'Dougall)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Dean of Guild Court (petition for Order to Repair/construct Footpath) / Appeal Judgment (inner House, First Division, Court of Session)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; Dean of Guild's order affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Dedication of Land to Public Use, Building Regulations, Street Repair Liability, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Neilson, Procurator-Fiscal of the Glasgow Dean of Guild Court
Petitioner/respondent
R. B. Wilson & Company
Defender/appellant
John Howie (representing Thomas M'Dougall)
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Dean of Guild Court (petition for Order to Repair/construct Footpath) / Appeal Judgment (inner House, First Division, Court of Session)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the strip of land between the building line and the former wall is dedicated to public street purposes under the Glasgow Building Regulations Act 1900, section 20.
- 2 Whether the proprietors are liable to repair or construct the footpath on that strip under the Glasgow Police Act 1866, section 317.
Ratio Decidendi
The strip of ground in question, by virtue of the statutory provisions and the plans submitted for lining, has been dedicated to public street purposes and cannot be reclaimed by the proprietor. The proprietors are liable for the formation and repair of the footpath as required by the Master of Works, and the Dean of Guild was correct in granting the order for the works to be executed at their expense.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; Dean of Guild's order affirmed
Orders
- Proprietors (R. B. Wilson & Company and John Howie) are ordained to execute the required works to form and repair the footpath as specified by the Master of Works.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment