Anderson v. North of Scotland Bank, Ltd [1901] ScotLR 39_75 (31 October 1901)

Anderson v. North of Scotland Bank, Ltd [1901] ScotLR 39_75 (31 October 1901)

The bank is contractually bound by the express terms of the deposit-receipt to pay its contents to either party presenting it, and cannot retain the funds in security of a debt due by only one depositor, regardless of extrinsic evidence of ownership.

Citation
[1901] ScotLR 39_75
Parties
Pursuer: Charles Fyfe Anderson; Concurring Pursuer: Miss Agnes Fyfe; Defender: North of Scotland Bank, Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
31 October 1901
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion)
Outcome
appeal dismissed; interlocutor adhered to
Legal Topics
Deposit Receipts, Banker's Obligation, Right of Retention, Compensation, Ownership of Deposited Funds
Banking Law Contract Law Deposit Receipts Banker's Obligation Right of Retention Compensation Ownership of Deposited Funds

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Fyfe Anderson

Pursuer

Miss Agnes Fyfe

Concurring Pursuer

North of Scotland Bank, Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a bank can retain funds under a deposit-receipt payable to either of two parties in security of a debt due by one party
  2. 2 Whether the bank's obligation under an unambiguous deposit-receipt can be defeated by extrinsic evidence of ownership
  3. 3 Whether compensation or retention is competent where the debt is due by only one of the depositors

Ratio Decidendi

The bank is contractually bound by the express terms of the deposit-receipt to pay its contents to either party presenting it, and cannot retain the funds in security of a debt due by only one depositor, regardless of extrinsic evidence of ownership.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; interlocutor adhered to

Orders

  • Bank ordered to pay £96, 8s. 5d. to pursuer in terms of deposit-receipt
  • Bank's pleas-in-law repelled