Dickie's Trustees v. Rutherford's Trustees [1907] ScotLR 960 (20 July 1907)
The 1897 trust-disposition and settlement impliedly revoked the 1860 settlement. The phrase 'writing under my hand' in the 1897 settlement referred only to writings made after 1897, not to the revoked 1860 settlement. The residue of the estate is to be divided into five equal portions among the two surviving sisters and the children of the predeceasing brother and sisters per stirpes, in accordance with the law of moveable succession in Scotland.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 960
- Parties
- Applicant: Dickie's Trustees; Respondent: Rutherford's Trustees; Third Party: Miss Agnes Orr Dickie; Fourth Party: George Dickie (heir in heritage); Fifth Party: Children of George Dickie, Mrs Jamieson, and Mrs Murray (fifth parties)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (succession/trust) / Judgment (inner House, Second Division)
- Outcome
- First alternative of the first question (implied revocation) answered in the affirmative; second alternative (partial effect) in the negative; first alternative of the second question (residue to surviving sisters only) in the negative; second alternative (division per stirpes among five shares) in the affirmative;...
- Legal Topics
- Implied Revocation of Testamentary Settlements, Construction of 'next of Kin' in Scottish Succession Law, Distribution of Residue Under Trust, Intestate Moveable Succession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dickie's Trustees
Applicant
Rutherford's Trustees
Respondent
Miss Agnes Orr Dickie
Third Party
George Dickie (heir in heritage)
Fourth Party
Children of George Dickie, Mrs Jamieson, and Mrs Murray (fifth parties)
Fifth Party
Procedural Posture
Special Case (succession/trust) / Judgment (inner House, Second Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1860 trust-disposition and settlement was impliedly revoked by the 1897 settlement
- 2 Whether the 1860 settlement could be treated as a 'writing under hand' for the purposes of the 1897 settlement
- 3 Proper construction of 'next-of-kin according to the law of moveable succession in Scotland' for residue distribution
Ratio Decidendi
The 1897 trust-disposition and settlement impliedly revoked the 1860 settlement. The phrase 'writing under my hand' in the 1897 settlement referred only to writings made after 1897, not to the revoked 1860 settlement. The residue of the estate is to be divided into five equal portions among the two surviving sisters and the children of the predeceasing brother and sisters per stirpes, in accordance with the law of moveable succession in Scotland.
Court Disposition
First alternative of the first question (implied revocation) answered in the affirmative; second alternative (partial effect) in the negative; first alternative of the second question (residue to surviving sisters only) in the negative; second alternative (division per stirpes among five shares) in the affirmative;...
Orders
- Declare the 1860 settlement impliedly revoked by the 1897 settlement.
- Order residue to be divided into five equal shares among the two surviving sisters and the children of predeceasing siblings per stirpes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment