Lowson v. Lowson [1902] ScotLR 39_444 (15 March 1902)
The Court held that the reclaimer, being in the position of a pursuer and resident abroad with no funds in Scotland, should be required to sist a mandatory.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_444
- Parties
- Petitioners and Respondents: J. A. Lowson and others; Respondent and Reclaimer: A. B. Lowson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Discharge of Judicial Factor and Appointment of New Judicial Factor / Reclaiming Motion Against Interlocutor Granting Discharge
- Outcome
- reclaimer ordained to sist a mandatory
- Legal Topics
- Discharge of Judicial Factor, Appointment of Mandatory, Objections to Accounts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J. A. Lowson and others
Petitioners and Respondents
A. B. Lowson
Respondent and Reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Petition for Discharge of Judicial Factor and Appointment of New Judicial Factor / Reclaiming Motion Against Interlocutor Granting Discharge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a reclaimer objecting to discharge of judicial factor must sist a mandatory when resident abroad and has no funds in the country
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the reclaimer, being in the position of a pursuer and resident abroad with no funds in Scotland, should be required to sist a mandatory.
Court Disposition
reclaimer ordained to sist a mandatory
Orders
- reclaimer to sist a mandatory by the third sederunt-day in the next ensuing session
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment