Mechan & Sons, Ltd v. Bow, M'Lachlan, & Co., Ltd [1910] ScotLR 650 (02 June 1910)
Defenders were barred from rejecting the tanks as they built them into the vessel without ascertaining compliance with contract conditions, constituting acceptance under section 35 of the Sale of Goods Act 1893.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 650
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mechan & Sons, Limited; Defender: Bow, M'Lachlan, & Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; interlocutor recalled; decerned against defenders as craved
- Legal Topics
- Disconformity to Contract, Right of Rejection, Acceptance of Goods, Construction of Contract, Sale of Goods Act 1893
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mechan & Sons, Limited
Pursuer
Bow, M'Lachlan, & Company, Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Were the tanks supplied disconform to contract?
- 2 Did the defenders have the right to reject the tanks after building them into the vessel?
- 3 Was the contract modified by parole evidence?
Ratio Decidendi
Defenders were barred from rejecting the tanks as they built them into the vessel without ascertaining compliance with contract conditions, constituting acceptance under section 35 of the Sale of Goods Act 1893.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; interlocutor recalled; decerned against defenders as craved
Orders
- Defenders held to have accepted the tanks; liable for contract price; counter-claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment