Finlay v. Glasgow Corporation [1915] ScotLR 446 (11 March 1915)
Diligence for recovery of employee reports made at or about the time of the accident is granted, but limited to those not prepared in contemplation of litigation, following established authority on the non-privileged status of such documents.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 446
- Parties
- Pursuer: Andrew Finlay (as tutor and administrator-in-law of Louise Margaret Finlay); Defenders: Corporation of the City of Glasgow
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages / Motion for Diligence for Recovery of Documents
- Outcome
- diligence for recovery of documents granted as limited
- Legal Topics
- Discovery of Documents, Confidentiality, Privilege, Personal Injury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Finlay (as tutor and administrator-in-law of Louise Margaret Finlay)
Pursuer
Corporation of the City of Glasgow
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages / Motion for Diligence for Recovery of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether diligence for recovery of reports and communications made by employees at or about the time of the accident should be granted
- 2 Whether such documents are privileged or confidential and thus protected from disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
Diligence for recovery of employee reports made at or about the time of the accident is granted, but limited to those not prepared in contemplation of litigation, following established authority on the non-privileged status of such documents.
Court Disposition
diligence for recovery of documents granted as limited
Orders
- Diligence for recovery of specified reports and communications made by employees at or about the time of the accident granted, restricted to documents not prepared in contemplation of litigation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment