Anderson, Petitioner [1912] ScotLR 863 (03 July 1912)
The commission was granted because the petitioner demonstrated she could not remain in Scotland for the duration required to call the case, due to financial hardship and employment obligations, and the defender's residence abroad would cause significant delay.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 863
- Parties
- Petitioner: Mrs Isabella Joiner or Anderson; Defender: Alexander Matthew Anderson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Petition (divorce) / Interlocutory Application for Commission to Take Evidence
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Evidence, Commission to Take Evidence, Proof, Oath De Calumnia
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Isabella Joiner or Anderson
Petitioner
Alexander Matthew Anderson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Petition (divorce) / Interlocutory Application for Commission to Take Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a commission should be granted to take the petitioner's evidence to lie in retentis due to her imminent return abroad before the divorce action could be called.
Ratio Decidendi
The commission was granted because the petitioner demonstrated she could not remain in Scotland for the duration required to call the case, due to financial hardship and employment obligations, and the defender's residence abroad would cause significant delay.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- Remit to Lord Dewar to take the petitioner's evidence to lie in retentis or appoint a commissioner to administer the oath de calumnia and take her evidence; dispense with interrogatories and reading in the minute book; order deposition and productions to be sealed and transmitted to the Clerk of Court to lie in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment