Barker v. Matevska [2007] ScotSC 64 (07 November 2007)
Defender's averments regarding alleged marriage in Libya and subsequent marriage by cohabitation and repute are irrelevant and lack specification, as no crave for declarator of marriage is made. Allegations of assault and abuse lack sufficient detail and causal link to financial hardship. Pleadings must be amended to cure technical deficiencies; only specified and relevant averments admitted to probation.
- Citation
- [2007] ScotSC 64
- Parties
- Pursuer: Brian Barker; Defender: Danche Matevska or Barker
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce / Interlocutory Judgment Following Debate on Pleadings
- Outcome
- Record opened up and amended; most of defender's averments in answer 2, and specified sentences in answers 3 and 5, refused admission to probation; warrant granted to defender to intimate action to heritable creditor; proof allowed on remaining averments; question of expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Financial Provision, Declarator of Marriage, Periodical Allowance, Transfer of Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Barker
Pursuer
Danche Matevska or Barker
Defender
Procedural Posture
Divorce / Interlocutory Judgment Following Debate on Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Irrelevance and lack of specification in defender's pleadings regarding alleged earlier marriage and assault
- 2 Entitlement to financial provision including transfer of property, capital sum, pension sharing, periodical allowance, and interim aliment
- 3 Requirement for consent of heritable creditor for property transfer
Ratio Decidendi
Defender's averments regarding alleged marriage in Libya and subsequent marriage by cohabitation and repute are irrelevant and lack specification, as no crave for declarator of marriage is made. Allegations of assault and abuse lack sufficient detail and causal link to financial hardship. Pleadings must be amended to cure technical deficiencies; only specified and relevant averments admitted to probation.
Court Disposition
Record opened up and amended; most of defender's averments in answer 2, and specified sentences in answers 3 and 5, refused admission to probation; warrant granted to defender to intimate action to heritable creditor; proof allowed on remaining averments; question of expenses reserved.
Orders
- Record amended by adding 'earned' to answer 3.
- Refusal to admit most of answer 2, fifth sentence of answer 3, and twenty-second sentence of answer 5 to probation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment