Carmichael v. maccoll [1913] ScotLR 693 (23 May 1913)
The Court held that the provisions of the Small Landholders (Scotland) Act 1911 regarding statutory small tenants apply to joint-tenants, and that the applicants were entitled to renewal of their tenancy as from Whitsunday 1912. The restrictive language in section 26(8) did not exclude joint-tenants from the statutory benefits, and the Act did not intend to foster new joint-tenancies but did not deprive existing joint-tenants of statutory rights.
- Citation
- [1913] ScotLR 693
- Parties
- Applicants: Hugh Carmichael senior and James Carmichael; Respondent: Duncan Maccoll
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 1913
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case Stated by the Scottish Land Court Under the Small Landholders (scotland) Act 1911 / Appeal to the Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Land Court affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Small Tenant, Joint Tenancy, Renewal of Tenancy, Competency of Application, Small Landholders (scotland) Act 1911
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh Carmichael senior and James Carmichael
Applicants
Duncan Maccoll
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Case Stated by the Scottish Land Court Under the Small Landholders (scotland) Act 1911 / Appeal to the Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the provisions of the Small Landholders (Scotland) Act 1911 regarding statutory small tenants apply to joint-tenants.
- 2 Whether the renewal of tenancy at Whitsunday 1912 was competent under the Act, or excluded by tacit relocation.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the provisions of the Small Landholders (Scotland) Act 1911 regarding statutory small tenants apply to joint-tenants, and that the applicants were entitled to renewal of their tenancy as from Whitsunday 1912. The restrictive language in section 26(8) did not exclude joint-tenants from the statutory benefits, and the Act did not intend to foster new joint-tenancies but did not deprive existing joint-tenants of statutory rights.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Land Court affirmed.
Orders
- Applicants declared joint statutory small tenants entitled to renewal of tenancy as from Whitsunday 1912.
- Objections to competency repelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment