Johnstone v. Lochgelly Magistrates [1913] ScotLR 907 (15 July 1913)

Johnstone v. Lochgelly Magistrates [1913] ScotLR 907 (15 July 1913)

The defenders owed no duty to fence or control access to land they did not own or control, nor to prevent or extinguish fires lit by third parties. The rubbish heap was not inherently dangerous, and liability cannot arise from the mere possibility of third-party acts. No relevant case of negligence was pled against the defenders.

Citation
[1913] ScotLR 907
Parties
Pursuer: Adam Johnstone; Defenders: Magistrates of Lochgelly
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
15 July 1913
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session Inner House, First Division
Outcome
action dismissed
Legal Topics
Duty of Care, Liability for Injury to Children, Occupier's Liability, Non Natural Use of Land, Public Safety, Liability for Acts of Third Parties
Tort Reparation Negligence Duty of Care Liability for Injury to Children Occupier's Liability Non Natural Use of Land Public Safety +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 26 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adam Johnstone

Pursuer

Magistrates of Lochgelly

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session Inner House, First Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defenders owed a duty of care to children frequenting land they did not own but used for refuse disposal.
  2. 2 Whether the defenders were liable for injuries caused by a fire on the refuse heap, not lit by themselves or their servants.
  3. 3 Whether leaving an unfenced rubbish heap with inflammable material constitutes negligence towards children.

Ratio Decidendi

The defenders owed no duty to fence or control access to land they did not own or control, nor to prevent or extinguish fires lit by third parties. The rubbish heap was not inherently dangerous, and liability cannot arise from the mere possibility of third-party acts. No relevant case of negligence was pled against the defenders.

Court Disposition

action dismissed

Orders

  • Recall the interlocutors of the Sheriff-Substitute dated 6th May 1913 and the Sheriff dated 25th January 1913.
  • Affirm the interlocutor of the Sheriff-Substitute dated 8th November 1912.