Struthers-Wright v. Nevis Range Development Company Plc [2006] ScotCS CSOH_68 (04 May 2006)
There is no legal duty on occupiers to warn or protect against obvious natural features such as cliff edges. The pursuer failed to establish a factual basis for negligence, and the accident was not caused by any breach of duty by the defenders.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_68
- Parties
- Pursuer: Peter Alastair Struthers-Wright; Defender: Nevis Range Development Company PLC
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Proof on Liability
- Outcome
- defenders assoilzied
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Obvious Dangers, Skiing Accidents, Warning Signs, Natural Features
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Alastair Struthers-Wright
Pursuer
Nevis Range Development Company PLC
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Proof on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders owed a duty to warn or protect against the natural feature of the cliff edge under the Occupiers' Liability (Scotland) Act 1960
- 2 Whether the defenders failed to take reasonable care to prevent injury to the pursuer
- 3 Whether the accident was caused by the pursuer's own fault
Ratio Decidendi
There is no legal duty on occupiers to warn or protect against obvious natural features such as cliff edges. The pursuer failed to establish a factual basis for negligence, and the accident was not caused by any breach of duty by the defenders.
Court Disposition
defenders assoilzied
Orders
- Case put out By Order for further procedure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment