A. B. v. E. F [1901] ScotLR 38_446 (08 March 1901)
Persistent and unexplained neglect of statutory duties by a curator bonis, including repeated failure to comply with the Accountant of Court's requisitions, constitutes sufficient grounds for removal from office, even in the absence of proven malversation or loss to the estate.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 38_446
- Parties
- Petitioner: A. B.; Respondent: E. F.
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Removal of Curator Bonis / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- petition allowed; curator bonis removed
- Legal Topics
- Curator Bonis, Neglect of Duty, Removal From Office, Court Supervision of Fiduciaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. B.
Petitioner
E. F.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Removal of Curator Bonis / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether persistent neglect of duty and failure to comply with court requisitions by a curator bonis justifies removal from office.
Ratio Decidendi
Persistent and unexplained neglect of statutory duties by a curator bonis, including repeated failure to comply with the Accountant of Court's requisitions, constitutes sufficient grounds for removal from office, even in the absence of proven malversation or loss to the estate.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; curator bonis removed
Orders
- Respondent removed from office of curator bonis.
- Respondent found liable in expenses to petitioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment