The Ballachulish Slate Quarries v. Menzies and Others [1908] ScotLR 667 (14 May 1908)

The Ballachulish Slate Quarries v. Menzies and Others [1908] ScotLR 667 (14 May 1908)

No proper assignation of uncalled capital was made in favour of debenture holders, and no proper intimation was given to shareholders; English floating charge forms are ineffective in Scots law; therefore, no valid security was created and debenture holders are mere holders of ordinary debt documents.

Citation
[1908] ScotLR 667
Parties
Petitioner: The Ballachulish Slate Quarries Company, Limited; Petitioner: J.H. Buchanan, C.A., liquidator of Ballachulish Slate Quarries Company, Limited; Respondent: Edward Bruce and others; Respondent: Robert Menzies, Solicitor, trustee for 1903 debenture holders
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
14 May 1908
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Companies Act for Determination of Questions in Liquidation / Judgment
Outcome
All securities claimed by debenture holders are invalid; debenture holders do not have preferential ranking.
Legal Topics
Security Over Uncalled Capital, Debenture Ranking, Assignation, Intimation, Floating Charge
Company Law Insolvency Secured Transactions Security Over Uncalled Capital Debenture Ranking Assignation Intimation Floating Charge

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Ballachulish Slate Quarries Company, Limited

Petitioner

J.H. Buchanan, C.A., liquidator of Ballachulish Slate Quarries Company, Limited

Petitioner

Edward Bruce and others

Respondent

Robert Menzies, Solicitor, trustee for 1903 debenture holders

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition Under Companies Act for Determination of Questions in Liquidation / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether debenture bonds confer valid security over uncalled capital of Easdale Company
  2. 2 Whether debenture holders are entitled to preferential ranking
  3. 3 Whether assignation and intimation requirements were met

Ratio Decidendi

No proper assignation of uncalled capital was made in favour of debenture holders, and no proper intimation was given to shareholders; English floating charge forms are ineffective in Scots law; therefore, no valid security was created and debenture holders are mere holders of ordinary debt documents.

Court Disposition

All securities claimed by debenture holders are invalid; debenture holders do not have preferential ranking.

Orders

  • First and second questions answered in the negative; debenture holders are in no better position than ordinary creditors.