M'Nab v. Fyfe [1904] ScotLR 41_736 (07 July 1904)
On the face of the record, the case was small and more suitable for proof in the Sheriff Court than for jury trial in the Court of Session; therefore, the appeal for jury trial was refused and the case remitted for proof.
- Citation
- [1904] ScotLR 41_736
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Neil M'Nab; Defender and Respondent: Robert Fyfe
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session for Jury Trial
- Outcome
- appeal refused; case remitted to Sheriff for proof
- Legal Topics
- Employers' Liability, Jury Trial, Proof Procedure, Workplace Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil M'Nab
Pursuer and Appellant
Robert Fyfe
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session for Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the case should be tried by jury in the Court of Session or remitted to the Sheriff Court for proof
- 2 Whether the averments of fault and injury justify a jury trial
Ratio Decidendi
On the face of the record, the case was small and more suitable for proof in the Sheriff Court than for jury trial in the Court of Session; therefore, the appeal for jury trial was refused and the case remitted for proof.
Court Disposition
appeal refused; case remitted to Sheriff for proof
Orders
- Appeal for jury trial refused
- Case remitted to Sheriff Court for proof
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment