Bell v. Adam & Co. [1907] ScotLR 775 (15 June 1907)
The Lord Ordinary's interlocutor was recalled because the Court was not satisfied that any part of the pursuer's case was irrelevant, and thus the general rule against interfering with the Lord Ordinary's discretion did not apply; the case was suitable for jury trial.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 775
- Parties
- Pursuer (reclaimer): Mrs Annie Macfarlane Rennie or Bell; Defenders (respondents): William Adam & Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages for Personal Injuries (death) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- interlocutor recalled; issue allowed
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Personal Injury, Mode of Trial, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Annie Macfarlane Rennie or Bell
Pursuer (reclaimer)
William Adam & Company
Defenders (respondents)
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages for Personal Injuries (death) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's averments were wholly or partly relevant for proof or jury trial
- 2 Whether the Lord Ordinary's discretion to allow proof before answer was properly exercised
- 3 Whether the case should proceed to jury trial or proof before answer
Ratio Decidendi
The Lord Ordinary's interlocutor was recalled because the Court was not satisfied that any part of the pursuer's case was irrelevant, and thus the general rule against interfering with the Lord Ordinary's discretion did not apply; the case was suitable for jury trial.
Court Disposition
interlocutor recalled; issue allowed
Orders
- The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary is recalled.
- An issue is allowed for jury trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment