Flannigan v. The Fife Coal Co., Ltd [1911] ScotLR 12 (24 October 1911)
The relevancy of the pursuer's case at common law cannot be determined apart from the facts; there are sufficient averments of statutory breach to justify sending the case to trial and approving the issue for jury consideration.
- Citation
- [1911] ScotLR 12
- Parties
- Pursuer (appellant): Hugh Flannigan; Defender (respondent): The Fife Coal Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages (reparation) / Appeal for Jury Trial; Approval of Issue
- Outcome
- case to go to trial; issue approved
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Negligence, Statutory Duty, Master and Servant, Coal Mine Safety
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh Flannigan
Pursuer (appellant)
The Fife Coal Company, Limited
Defender (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages (reparation) / Appeal for Jury Trial; Approval of Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's case at common law is relevant in addition to the admitted statutory claim under the Employers' Liability Act 1880
- 2 Whether breach of statutory duty under the Coal Mines Regulation Act 1887 gives rise to absolute liability at common law
- 3 Whether the defenders failed to appoint competent persons and properly secure the mine roof as required by statute
Ratio Decidendi
The relevancy of the pursuer's case at common law cannot be determined apart from the facts; there are sufficient averments of statutory breach to justify sending the case to trial and approving the issue for jury consideration.
Court Disposition
case to go to trial; issue approved
Orders
- The Court approved the proposed issue for jury trial.
- The case proceeds to trial for determination of liability and damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment